Analysis argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Analysis argument - Essay ExampleThese are rightful(prenominal) two standards there are countless similar occasions in the article where statements deal been do without evidence. Andersons article is more of an essay than an argument since throughout the article, he has just contained ad hominem opinions without providing evidence for them to enhance the credibility of his argument. Anderson has basically used the article as a means to express his personal opinions. Basically the article is a reflection on the authors personal experiences that have led him to developing certain views that he has shared in an organized way. This makes the article informative sort of than argumentative. Although the articles credibility is little because of lack of references, yet the views Anderson has shared are sensible and see to be coming from a learned and experienced author. I specially agree to the fact that playing depiction games may be one of the risk factors that play a role in reservation the youth criminals, yet it is too subtle and ineffective a factor to have such a large negative effect on the psychology of the children as to make them killers. One factor that is particularly out of place in the article is that although Anderson has cited no study, yet he has gone to such lengths as comparing incompatible studies and the underlying factors as sample sizings, as he says, Why have different researchers found different results? Well, part of the problem is that many studies have used a sample size that is much too small to produce consistent results (Anderson cited in Ramage, Bean, and Johnson 447). Greenberg has started his argument with a strong principal saying that Yee had Sen. Leland Yee did not have robust grounds to impose restriction on childrens assenting to violent word-painting games since it was essentially an outcome of the ban on substance abuse which in no way compares to the video games. I find Greenbergs argument very convincing that violent books and movies do not provide the audiences with a room to respond whereas violent games do, but the same power of interactivity that the video games provide the audiences could be held as a strong reason why they should be banned. Although Greenbergs example was good, but in effect, it counteracted his own argument that was in favor of expression of violence in video games, though the examples Greenberg has given regarding how video games enhance the critical analysis and decision-making skills of the audiences are entirely convincing. These examples also request the potential ways in which violent games serve as mediums of free expression for the players, thus providing Greenberg with a firm basis for his argument. One thing that makes Greenbergs article superior to Andersons is that Greenberg has not indicated studies anywhere and accordingly he did not need to cite them, whereas Andersons article was mostly based on the results of past studies without mentioning any in particular. Greenbergs examples in support of his argument were such that they did not bring much citation or referencing, and the examples were plentiful as well. When the examples did require referencing, they were included. For example, when Greenberg discussed the Supreme Courts judgment that school boards are not allowed to ban books in the libraries of the schools even if they are accessible outside